The article that Bil posted isn't the kind of fluency work that I've
seen.  I was a Reading Recovery teacher for many years and worked with
kids and fluency often. Using The Giver doesn't make sense to me and I
think there are a lot of very knowledgeable teachers who work with timed
fluency in very meaningful ways.  I still see as a middle school teacher
that fluency plays a critical role in the success of our readers who
struggle.  Fluency is directly affected by comprehension and vice
versa---the same thing for writing---we have so many kids that have
difficulty thinking about writing and actually putting pen to paper at
the same time that the thinking is happening that we do all kinds of
quick writes and strategies to help them with that process. We tell them
to just get something down, put an empty circle or line to represent a
word you can't come up with right then---writing is so much more
concrete. The same kind of process has to occur for readers.  We need to
keep looking for ways to encourage that fluency.  As adults our reading
pace constantly fluctuates based on what we are reading.  Our kids who
struggle need to actually "feel" what it's like to read at a pace where
meaning, structure, and visual cues all come together.  That rarely if
ever happens for them.  I've watched kids who have increased their
fluency through repeated timed readings actually celebrate their feeling
like a reader for the first time.  I completely agree this is only part
of helping those strugglers, but the way they sound is what usually
categorizes them (with their peer groups) as low readers.

>>> May Dartez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 10/28/2006 7:22 AM >>>
I have really enjoyed following this discussion. By common sense, just

like you had felt, I felt as if the fluency checks were a complete 
waste of time and did not support them. However, I attended the Teacher

to Teacher workshops over the summer and did see some of the research 
that supports fluency checks and teaching.

I think that any kind of literacy program needs to be balanced and 
focused on comprehension, but it did convince me that fluency should be

a strong part of a balanced program.

May Dartez
6th, GA
On Oct 27, 2006, at 11:01 PM, Margie Waterbrook wrote:

> On 10/27/06, Bill IVEY <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> . Note the phrase I highlighted mid-description - would you
>> agree in general? For your school?
>>
>>    It's really interesting timing that you posted this today, Bill.
>> Several years ago I worked at a charter school where it seemed all
the
>> special ed reading teacher did was time kids on their reading...and

>> my group
>> of friends on the  the faculty, from a common-sense rather than a 
>> research
>> point-of-view--just thought it was ridiculous and one more reason we

>> all
>> wanted OUT of that particular school.
>
>
>        Now I am at a much better school and teach an "English
Support" 
> class
> with a special ed teacher whom I respect...and, much to my surprise,

> all of
> a sudden we are doing these fluency checks. We discussed this, and
she 
> tells
> me that that was her reaction at first as well...but that she dug
into 
> the
> research and it supports this kind of teaching.
>        Research v. common sense...this approach still doesn't make 
> sense to
> me. Luckily, unlike at the earlier school, where this is about all 
> they did,
> we have a much more balanced program. But I am still unconvinced
about
> pushing for speed. It's not as if it's a typing class!
>        Margie
>
> Margie Waterbrook
> 9th & 10th Grade English
> Vail High School
> Vail, AZ
>
> "Success is going from failure to failure without losing
enthusiasm."
> --Winston Churchill
> _______________________________________________
> The Literacy Workshop ListServ http://www.literacyworkshop.org 
>
> To unsubscribe or modify your membership please go to 
>
http://literacyworkshop.org/mailman/options/lit_literacyworkshop.org.
>
> Search the LIT archives at http://snipurl.com/LITArchive 
>

_______________________________________________
The Literacy Workshop ListServ http://www.literacyworkshop.org 

To unsubscribe or modify your membership please go to
http://literacyworkshop.org/mailman/options/lit_literacyworkshop.org.

Search the LIT archives at http://snipurl.com/LITArchive 

_______________________________________________
The Literacy Workshop ListServ http://www.literacyworkshop.org

To unsubscribe or modify your membership please go to 
http://literacyworkshop.org/mailman/options/lit_literacyworkshop.org.

Search the LIT archives at http://snipurl.com/LITArchive 

Reply via email to