On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 6:38 AM, Jody Garnett <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Does anyone else have suggestions that we should follow? >> >> Quick comment: Sphinx is good for documentations and is, in my >> opinion, not so appropriate for entire web sites. Do GeoServer and >> MapServer use Sphinx for their entire web sites or only for >> documentation? >> > MapServer and GeoTools use it for entire websites. For udig I just > have a combo of static html pages (and a bit of php) checked into svn. > > The general approach here is to commit the website into svn so the > developers working on the project can update it. Selection of raw html > or text + template is kind of up to us here on the development list. > > Given we have pretty limited needs for a website I would go for sphinx > (note you can still break out lots of custom html as the template used > for the site would be committed into svn as well).
Sounds good to me. -- Eric Lemoine Camptocamp France SAS Savoie Technolac, BP 352 73377 Le Bourget du Lac, Cedex Tel : 00 33 4 79 44 44 96 Mail : [email protected] http://www.camptocamp.com _______________________________________________ Live-demo mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/live-demo
