Cameron wrote:
We could specify maturity as a string, of maturity levels, with the
current maturity in bold, like:
Maturity: (mature | *established*
| stable | beta)
This still helps users distinguish between projects, without stars.
Would that address people's concerns?
Sounds good to me (although I don't really see the need to list the unused
words; seems obvious).
I just couldn't see giving a project like GMT with 1000s of spottings in
journals like Science and Nature a 2/5 == "stable" star rating and not have
someone in the audience saying 'wtf?' ..
what would the difference between "mature" and "established" be? how about vs
.stable?
Hamish
ps- the many fixes from the 4.0rc1 build seemed to have been quiet for a number
of days, so time for the next one?
_______________________________________________
Live-demo mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/live-demo
http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Live_GIS_Disc
