Brian,
I hear what you are saying about the natural earth having bland data to
work with.
I suggest that since we haven't much time for this release, go with the
natural earth dataset, and potentially get a better dataset with the
next release.
Best to go for the simple and achievable right now, and improve later.
On 19/07/10 11:32, Brian Hamlin wrote:
Hi All-
I am looking at the 10m Natural Earth vectors as a PostGIS database..
its very compact.. perhaps 12 MB when loaded.. on the other hand,
there aren't a lot of interesting corners in there, from a data point
of view..
(not too surprising, since it is a visual treatment, first and foremost)
The basic dataset in the examples from the LiveDVD v3 was 'medford'
Medford is a rich, detailed and interesting set.. about 70-80MB when
loaded..
At some point soon, the examples, quickstart, or equivalent are
going to have to be written for the LiveDVD v4 such that it refers to
something in PostGIS. Right now we have the osm_local, Barcelona,
which, while great for rendering via Mapnik, is a particularly poor
choice for general PostGIS demonstration..
So, I am wondering aloud what set(s) to use...
(I am not going to dig up some cool Spain oriented set in time, of
that I am sure..)
(the Sydney set from v3 is not worth re-using)
-Brian
==
Brian Hamlin
planetwork.net
OSGeo California Chapter
(415) 717-4462 cell
_______________________________________________
Live-demo mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/live-demo
http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Live_GIS_Disc
--
Cameron Shorter
Geospatial Solutions Manager
Tel: +61 (0)2 8570 5050
Mob: +61 (0)419 142 254
Think Globally, Fix Locally
Geospatial Solutions enhanced with Open Standards and Open Source
http://www.lisasoft.com
_______________________________________________
Live-demo mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/live-demo
http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Live_GIS_Disc
