On Jun 27, 2011, at 12:54 PM, [email protected] wrote: > Hi - > > > > two thoughts: > > > > * GDAL users certainly outnumber OTB users, both humans and applications, so > a custom patch to GDAL .deb to support OTB does not sound good > > > > * However, I a suspicious that the GDAL .deb has so much trouble with > external TIFF.. maybe there is a flaw in the way they are packaging GDAL..
This is also a problem for libLAS (Is this actually *due* to OTB using libLAS?). GDAL hasn't come up with a good solution to the problem yet either. Francesco has been complaining about the libgeotiff/libtiff linkage issues for years as well, but there hasn't been a satisfactory patch to cure the issue. It's GDAL's fault, not its packaging. Howard_______________________________________________ Live-demo mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/live-demo http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Live_GIS_Disc
