Brian,
Based upon Peter's request, my feeling is that we should revert back to
Postgres 8.4.
Our emphasis on OSGeo-Live is "stability over cutting edge". This is
because we are targeting new users who will be very quickly turned off
if they find a bug, and will generally not be looking to check out the
latest and greatest. (They can always go to a project page later if they
want to find latest features).
Anyone wish to weigh in on this topic before we make a call on which
posgres to use?
On 22/01/12 20:55, Peter Baumann wrote:
Hi Brian,
sorry, we have not tested rasdaman with PG 9.x yet. Given the short
time remaining and current project pressure we won't be able to do so
for this DVD roll-out. As in the past even minor release changes in PG
have led to incompatibilities this deserves special attention. We'd
kindly ask you therefore to keep 8.4 available.
thanks for your understanding,
Peter
On 01/22/2012 06:15 AM, [email protected] wrote:
Hi All-
I just changed the Postgres version to 9.1
install scripts for the applications listed above explicitly call out a
postgres version (8.4)
Please check your app install scripts as we transition to the improved
9.1 postgres base
thanks!
==
Brian Hamlin
GeoCal
OSGeo California Chapter
415-717-4462 cell
_______________________________________________
Live-demo mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/live-demo
http://live.osgeo.org
http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Live_GIS_Disc
--
Cameron Shorter
Geospatial Solutions Manager
Tel: +61 (0)2 8570 5050
Mob: +61 (0)419 142 254
Think Globally, Fix Locally
Geospatial Solutions enhanced with Open Standards and Open Source
http://www.lisasoft.com
_______________________________________________
Live-demo mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/live-demo
http://live.osgeo.org
http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Live_GIS_Disc
