I agree with what Frank and Angelos said. It could be also a good idea to move the OSGeo Live project to its own SVN repository and TRAC instance. Currently it uses the "osgeo" repository and TRAC, but I think it would better fit into this list as a separate project: https://trac.osgeo.org/ I don't know how difficult it is though to do the changes.
Daniel On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 7:25 PM, Angelos Tzotsos <[email protected]>wrote: > On 04/02/2012 12:42 PM, Frank Gasdorf wrote: > >> Hallo List, >> >> Is it possible to define several milestones for the osgeo live project >> in Trac. IMHO its a good way to coordinate several activities and >> committers. In addition we can use Milestones to write down release >> notes and included tickets for bugs enhancements and tasks. An other >> PRO is to the change to link bugs to the relevant released version. >> >> What do you think about defining a new Milestone 'OSGeo Live 6.0' and >> a version 'OSGeo Live 5.5' right here : >> http://trac.osgeo.org/osgeo/**admin/ticket/versions<http://trac.osgeo.org/osgeo/admin/ticket/versions>(maybe >> for the older >> releases as well (5.0, 4.5)) >> >> If anybody got bug reports or have other issues with the current or >> prior release we could associate the bugs to the matching version. >> >> What do you think about such a management improvement? I could help >> defining and managing such milestones. Properly we could plan a next >> release on IRC and put relevant issues/tasks into the basket. >> >> What do you think about coordinate translations with such Trac-tasks >> instead of an wiki-Page >> (http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/**Talk:Live_GIS_Translate<http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Talk:Live_GIS_Translate>). >> IMHO its quite >> easy to assign tickets to myself and everybody have a clue whats in >> the pipeline and who is working on. And properly who needs help to >> finish tasks for an upcoming release. >> >> Feedback is warmly wellcome >> >> Cheers >> Frank >> ______________________________**_________________ >> Live-demo mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.osgeo.org/**mailman/listinfo/live-demo<http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/live-demo> >> http://live.osgeo.org >> http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/**Live_GIS_Disc<http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Live_GIS_Disc> >> >> Hi Frank, > > I agree that we should use Trac in more depth for our 6.0 development. > We also have to clear old bug reports and associate them with the latest > release, as you suggest. > > For the coordination of translations though I think the current tools > serve us well, since each language is maintained by separate teams, so we > do not need to put much details in Trac (this would require enough effort). > If you just mean to track milestones for translations (eg Overviews > completeness, Quickstart completeness, sync of each language with trunk > english documents etc) then +1 from me. > > Cheers, > Angelos > > > -- > Angelos Tzotsos > Remote Sensing Laboratory > National Technical University of Athens > http://users.ntua.gr/tzotsos > > ______________________________**_________________ > Live-demo mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.osgeo.org/**mailman/listinfo/live-demo<http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/live-demo> > http://live.osgeo.org > http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/**Live_GIS_Disc<http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Live_GIS_Disc> > -- Georepublic UG & Georepublic Japan eMail: [email protected] Web: http://georepublic.de
_______________________________________________ Live-demo mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/live-demo http://live.osgeo.org http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Live_GIS_Disc
