Hello,
Do OpenHub metrics reflect an active and healthy community:
https://live.osgeo.org/en/metrics.html
Maybe we should inform the projects if their OpenHub metrics shows low
activity. We had it with Mapbender a while ago too. OpenHub did not make
get the statistics although there was activity in the project. We had to
contact the OpenHub team and they fixed it.
Looks like in Leaflet project it is similar. Activity is not available
says OpenHub but on github are regular commits.
https://www.openhub.net/p/Leaflet/enlistments
Astrid
Am 2017-04-13 22:05, schrieb Cameron Shorter:
Thanks Vicky, Micha, Pirmin,
This is really good feedback.
I've introduction text to:
"For our next OSGeo-Live release, 11.0, we propose to reduce the
number of packages included, and only support a 64 bit distribution,
(32 bit will be built but not tested or officially supported)."
Regarding OpenHub metrics, I'm very aware that it has many
imperfections. However, as far as I'm aware, it is the best available,
and hence we reference it from OSGeo-Live.
While projects should rightly be concerned if OSGeo-Live only uses
OpenHub metrics to assess project health, they should be significantly
more concerned about the general public's assessment of their project.
I think it should be a priority of all projects to try an ensure their
OpenHub metrics reflect the true health of their project as new users
can, do, and should make use such metrics as part of their due
diligence of project selection.
Warm regard, Cameron
On 13/4/17 5:45 pm, Micha Silver wrote:
On 04/13/2017 09:31 AM, Pirmin Kalberer wrote:
Hi Cameron,
Am Mittwoch, 12. April 2017, 21.25:27 schrieb Cameron Shorter:
As per our last meeting, I've created a draft press release about
descoping OSGeo-Live.
https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Live_GIS_Disc_Press_Release_75
Review comments are welcome
For non-native speakers like me, an earlier hint what the euphemism
"descoping" is standing for, would be very helpful.
Two comments:
Even with English as my mother tongue, I had to think twice about what
phrase referred to. Why not just say outright: "removing some
projects".
Regarding the list of considerations to assess projects, we need to
keep in mind that some projects, spatialite for example, use version
control systems that are not "Openhub-friendly". So they are sorely
under-represented on Openhub.
Best,
Micha
Regards
Pirmin
--
Micha Silver
cell: +972-523-665918
_______________________________________________
Live-demo mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/live-demo
http://live.osgeo.org
http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Live_GIS_Disc
--
Cameron Shorter
M +61 419 142 254
_______________________________________________
Live-demo mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/live-demo
http://live.osgeo.org
http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Live_GIS_Disc
--
--
Astrid Emde
Charter Member
Open Source Geospatial Foundation
http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/User:Astrid_Emde
_______________________________________________
Live-demo mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/live-demo
http://live.osgeo.org
http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Live_GIS_Disc
