On 2017-04-20 16:03, James Klassen wrote:
Speaking as a member of the GeoMoose PSC and as one of the people who
keeps
GeoMoose up to date in OSGeo-Live... It isn't clear to me what to do
about
it but for the record OpenHub seems to be pretty confused about
GeoMoose.
It is missing our early history (2005-2009). It is confused about our
recent history (probably because of our use of git submodules). And it
is
completely unaware of our 3.0 developments (which are happening in new
repos, incidently because we want to move away from git submodules).
As a project we would much rather be putting our time into maintaining
2.9.x and into the current effort to moderize our project for what will
become our 3.0 release than worring about how to get a black box
(OpenHub)
to properly understand our project's history. Maybe when things quiet
down
OpenHub tinkering will make it to the top of the list, but I don't see
that
being the case anytime soon.
OpenHub is just one metric. Just make sure the project information and
the repositories it monitors are correct and complete. [0]
Because it's not an open source project the community can easily
participate in, you shouldn't give too much weight to OpenHub.
[0] https://www.openhub.net/p/geomoose/settings
Kind Regards,
Bas
_______________________________________________
Live-demo mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/live-demo
http://live.osgeo.org
http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Live_GIS_Disc
