Hi Scott,
Thanks for your response and URL. Could you please update us on current
status and schedule for OGC documentation.
* Is the documentation at
http://cite.opengeospatial.org/pub/cite/files/edu/index.html considered
draft, ready for production, other?
* Is there a maintenance program in place to ensure that this
documentation is continuously kept up to date? Eg: to update existing
documentation whenever a new standard is published.
* It appears that the URL provided only mentions WMS KML, SLD, SE, CSW
standards. Is there any commitment to generate documentation for other
standards?
Warm regards, Cameron
On 26/4/17 2:12 am, Scott Simmons wrote:
Hi Cameron,
OGC would very much like to be the source of documentation where
possible to keep you from duplicating effort! Perhaps you could link
to our material where it is current and useful (as you referenced in
your mail) and I will be sure to keep you informed as we accelerate
our “implementer-friendly” standards documentation. Examples of such
documentation can be found here:
http://cite.opengeospatial.org/pub/cite/files/edu/index.html
Where the OSGeo community has developed superior documentation, you
may want to stick with that material until we get our material ready.
Best Regards,
Scott
Scott Simmons
Executive Director, Standards Program
Open Geospatial Consortium (OGC)
tel +1 970 682 1922
mob +1 970 214 9467
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
The OGC: Making Location Count…
www.opengeospatial.org <http://www.opengeospatial.org>
On Apr 24, 2017, at 6:00 PM, Cameron Shorter
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
To date, OSGeo-Live documentation has included write ups of a number
of OGC Standards (including both English master text and
translations). [1]
However, this documentation hasn't been maintained for a number of years.
As we go through rationalising what we continue to include on
OSGeo-Live, we are wondering what should be done about OGC standards
text on OSGeo-Live.
I'm aware of the OGC has created some material [2], which on first
glance looks to be more complete and more current than the OSGeo-Live
material.
I'm interested to hear thoughts (especially from the OGC) on what we
should do in moving forward.
* Should we drop OSGeo-Live write up of OGC Standards all together,
as it is not core business of OSGeo? (This would free up some space
on OSGeo-Live)
* Should we provide a reference to a OGC Standards URL? If so, where
would that be?
* Should we make a copy OGC standards into OSGeo-Live docs? If so,
who will take responsibility for writing and maintaining the build
scripts.
* Would the OGC want to investigate using OSGeo-Live's existing
translation community to translate OGC docs? If so, how should this
be approached and who would like to coordinate it?
Thoughts will be welcomed.
[1] https://live.osgeo.org/en/standards/standards.html
[2] https://github.com/opengeospatial/ogc_school
--
Cameron Shorter
M +61 419 142 254
_______________________________________________
Standards mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/standards
--
Cameron Shorter
M +61 419 142 254
_______________________________________________
Live-demo mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/live-demo
http://live.osgeo.org
http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Live_GIS_Disc
