Thank you for reaching out to this list.
Please let us know if we can help you in the process.
On 04/04/2018 11:16 AM, HaeKyong Kang wrote:
Dear Angelos and all
Regarding to quickstart/manuals of UN OSGeo Challenge 2: GeoAnalysis--it will be
prepared by around the end of April 2018 (or earlier). I will send you a link
when it will be ready.
If you need hands for documentation of the Challenge 2, three mentors of the
Challenge 2(Prof. D.H Cho, Mr. Minpa Lee, HaeKyong Kang) will be pleased to
PS. Sorry for my late response because of my business trip.
Geospatial Information Researchc Division
Korea Research Institute for Human Settlements
T 82 044 960 0405
F 82 044 211 4776
H 82 010 2033 5998
---------- *원본 메일* ----------
*보낸사람*: "Angelos Tzotsos" <gcpp.kal...@gmail.com>
*받는사람*: "live-demo" <email@example.com>
*참조*: "Cameron Shorter" <cameron.shor...@gmail.com>, "u...@lists.osgeo.org"
<u...@lists.osgeo.org>, "Haekyong" <hkk...@krihs.re.kr>, "Serena Coetzee"
<serenacoet...@gmail.com>, "Christina Hupy" <ch...@boundlessgeo.com>,
Antonia Brovelli" <maria.brove...@polimi.it>
*날짜*: 2018-03-30 (금) 17:34:30
*제목*: Re: [UN] UN OSGeo Challenge
We had a short discussion about this topic 2 weeks ago in our weekly
OSGeoLive meeting, where we asked for volunteers to mentor this initiative.
As a result of those challenges for OSGeoLive I would see:
1. Some updated quickstarts (e.g. GeoNode which is the code base of
2. New workshop materials being added in the wiki we publish, along with
Any volunteers for helping out as mentors for the documentation?
On Fri, Mar 30, 2018 at 12:26 AM, Maria Antonia Brovelli
<maria.brove...@polimi.it <mailto:maria.brove...@polimi.it>> wrote:
Yes, we already presented the initiative to Angelos and Astrid.
Many thanks for the suggestions.
About the criteria
1) being charter member is not mandatory; everybody can apply. On the
other side charter members are people who were awarded with this title
and we believe that it is worth to be considered.
2) we want to have young people but with experience in education and
training as they have to produce this kind of material.
I believe there are many good candidates and the competition will be
Thanks a lot also for the typos that we will correct.
Inviato dal mio dispositivo Samsung
-------- Messaggio originale --------
Da: Cameron Shorter <cameron.shor...@gmail.com
Data: 29/03/18 22:08 (GMT+01:00)
A: u...@lists.osgeo.org <mailto:u...@lists.osgeo.org>, live-demo
<firstname.lastname@example.org <mailto:email@example.com>>, Angelos
Tzotsos <gcpp.kal...@gmail.com <mailto:gcpp.kal...@gmail.com>>
Oggetto: Re: [UN] UN OSGeo Challenge
Maria, OSGeo UN Committee, OSGeoLive team,
Great initiative, I'm very supportive.
I'm excited to see OSGeoLive engaged prominently in the criteria. I
think that OSGeoLive has the potential to be a great asset to the
education community and this is an excellent initiative to fast track
Have you been talking with someone from the OSGeoLive team about the
practical implementation? (Angelos would be a good start). There are a
few things that I think need to be thought through:
* OSGeoLive is currently space constrained to our distribution medium.
Typically a 4 Gig or 8 Gig USB. Large teaching datasets could cause us
challenges. We have options to address this, but it is something we
should consider up front.
* OSGeoLive has remained a healthy project for 8 years in part because
we have ensured our cost of maintenance doesn't exceed our volunteer
capacity. We need to think through how can maintain any material
created, and how we can keep maintenance requirements to a minimum.
Re: evaluation criteria:
On 29/3/18 10:45 pm, Maria Antonia Brovelli wrote:
> Evaluation criteria:
> 1. Proposer is an OSGeo Charter Member
* I'd suggest this be changed to "has demonstrable experience within
OSGeo community". One of our best technical contributors to OSGeoLive,
who regularly also gave great council, as well as writing very good
documentation, was someone who shunned titles and has never signed up
be an OSGeo Charter member. (As I write this, I think he'd be a good
candidate for this project - if he could be tempted). There are others
like him. They shouldn't be excluded from applying.
On the other hand, there are some OSGeo Charter members who have done
little after joining. I believe creating a "honey-pot" will lead to
people applying for charter membership for personal benefit instead of
> 1. Proposer’s age (20 if < 40 years old; 0 if >40 years old)
* I question the purpose of this? If you are trying to increase young
people applying, then an age break at 40 doesn't help the struggling
of the age spectrum. (I'd be more inclined to make a break at say 25).
I think you will find older people, will self select themselves out
based on their typically higher pay grade.
I'd be inclined to remove this criteria all together.
Angelos Tzotsos, PhD
OSGeo Charter Member
Angelos Tzotsos, PhD
Open Source Geospatial Foundation
OSGeoLive mailing list