I specified that I don't want to use threads...
Is there another way to solve?
--- On Mon, 3/22/10, Matt Schuckmannn <m...@schuckmannacres.com> wrote:
From: Matt Schuckmannn <m...@schuckmannacres.com>
Subject: Re: [Live-devel] make the live555 scheduler working together with
other schedulers
To: "LIVE555 Streaming Media - development & use" <live-de...@ns.live555.com>
Date: Monday, March 22, 2010, 11:13 PM
My approach for this kind of stuff has been to put them in separate
threads (I'd probably create a thread for Live555) and then just use
some sort of thread safe communication for passing events and data
between the 2, e.g. a socket or thread safe queue, etc.
Matt S.
On 3/22/2010 2:27 AM, Alberto Alberici wrote:
Hi,
which is the best way to make the live555 library work together with
another library which has its own main scheduler (for example: qt),
_without using threads_?
I mean: qt has app.exec(), which doesn't return, and live555 has
doEventLoop(), which doesn't return.... Of course I could write
MyScheduler and then call singleStep(), which returns, instead of
calling doEventLoop(), but in this case singleStep() would return only
after the select() wait (and this would block the other library,
meanwhile) ....
thanks
_______________________________________________
live-devel mailing list
live-devel@lists.live555.com
http://lists.live555.com/mailman/listinfo/live-devel
-----Inline Attachment Follows-----
_______________________________________________
live-devel mailing list
live-devel@lists.live555.com
http://lists.live555.com/mailman/listinfo/live-devel
_______________________________________________
live-devel mailing list
live-devel@lists.live555.com
http://lists.live555.com/mailman/listinfo/live-devel
