> Threads != instances???. Don’t I still need a way of keeping all the instance
> data separate? How does the callback allow me to differentiate between
> different instances (other than just the RTSPClient* itself?
Once again, I don't understand. What's an "instance". Your "RTSPClient"
subclass can contain whatever fields you like. The "RTSPClient*" pointer that
you get in each of your response handler callbacks will be the same
"RTSPClient*" on which you made the request; it should be able to
(unambigously) give you all the state that you need.
And no, don't "lie" to the interface (at least, not if you expect help on this
mailing list).
And yes, of course the "RTSPClient*" is used internally.
Once again - if you (e.g.) call
fooClient->sendOptionsCommand(continueAfterOPTIONS, ourAuthenticator);
Then, when the "continueAfterOPTIONS()" response handler later gets called, its
first parameter will be "fooClient" - i.e., a pointer to the same "RTSPClient"
object on which you made the request.
Ross Finlayson
Live Networks, Inc.
http://www.live555.com/
_______________________________________________
live-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.live555.com/mailman/listinfo/live-devel
