> Since, I just want to receive stream and send to decoder, do you think using
> testRTSPClient over OpenRTSP would be an advantage or there should be no
> difference if either one is used from CPU cycles perspective? I’m about to
> profile both on my system.
Both applications use about the same amount of CPU. However, "testRTSPClient"
is much cleaner and easier to understand (because, in contrast, "openRTSP" has
many optional features). So "testRTSPClient" is what you should use as a model.
> I had read in one of the FAQs Live555 is not thread safe.
That's true, but somewhat misleading. It's like saying that a high-speed rail
carriage is not 'airworthy'.
> Does that mean if a multithreaded application wants to use it, application
> has to synchronize between objects it is using from Live555?
This is all explained very clearly in the FAQ - that everyone was asked to read
before posting to this mailing list. See:
http://www.live555.com/liveMedia/faq.html#threads
Ross Finlayson
Live Networks, Inc.
http://www.live555.com/
_______________________________________________
live-devel mailing list
live-devel@lists.live555.com
http://lists.live555.com/mailman/listinfo/live-devel
