Phil, don't take this so personally, but just think about O.J., Robert 
Blake, etc....Do you really think justice was served?


Steve Weinstein
S/V HYDRO-THERAPY
1981 Cherubini Hunter 33
Sailing out of Oyster Bay, NY

All outgoing mail protected by Norton A/V


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Philip McConnell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, June 14, 2008 2:30 PM
Subject: Re: [Liveaboard] Manslaughter Charges from Drunken Sailing - FYI


As a native born Californian, your comments are insulting. Name calling
is not productive. If you look, I think that you'll find the tendency to
shield law enforcement officials from reprehensible behavior is a nation
wide problem.

-- 
Philip McConnell
USSV Gryphon
1987 Tayana 52 CC Cutter
Fort Pierce, FL



mg wrote:
> The jury could very well find him guilty.....and the officer go free.
> It is California...land of fruits and nuts...a whole lot of nuts.
> There is a financial crisis in California. The state has been bankrupt
> for years, they won't admit it. I won't go into the reasons. It DOES
> take two years. That is not unusual, except for high profile cases
> such as OJ etc.
> In this case, Latitude is not strong enough in its assessment of the
> right and wrong.
>
> It is amazing what a combination of strong
> emotion, faulty assumption and inexperience
> can do. It can make a high IQ type act like an utter
> natural-born fool and make them believe things
> no thinking person ever would.
>
>
>     ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>     *From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>     [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of
>     [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>     *Sent:* Saturday, June 14, 2008 10:10 AM
>     *To:* [email protected]
>     *Subject:* Re: [Liveaboard] Manslaughter Charges from Drunken
>     Sailing - FYI
>
>     Is there a question that a jury will not find him innocent ? Will
>     the guilt of the officer not come out in the trial? Who is driving
>     the case, the insurance company? Is the court docket so deep that
>     it takes two years to come to trial? That, in itself, seems
>     reproachable.
>
>     -----Original Message-----
>     From: Ed Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>     To: [email protected]
>     Sent: Sat, 14 Jun 2008 11:47 am
>     Subject: [Liveaboard] Manslaughter Charges from Drunken Sailing - FYI
>
>     2 yrs ago in April, on a California lake, a Deputy Sheriff drove a
>     powerboat at 45 mph in the dark, despite knowing many small
>     sail boats and dinghys sometimes did not have lights on marking
>     them, claiming he was doing surveilance work; he said he'd had
>     done it before, and was safe because he could see other boats
>     outlines against the shore after dark so as to avoid them.
>
>     This night he slammed into a sailboat drifting in no wind with 3
>     folks on it. The deputy claimed the sailboat did not have its lights
>     on but at least one other person in law enforcement disputed that.
>
>     A middle aged woman was killed in the collision when they
>     were hit by the speed boat. Neither the owner or the other
>     man on boat were killed.
>
>     The person at the wheel of the speedboat had been drinking
>     earlier that afternoon and had a blood alcohol level of .120
>     - which is over the legal limit.
>
>     So they have charged the man on the sailboat with Manslaughter
>     as he was legally intoxicated and a death resulted. Such laws
>     are intended to send a message that its dangerous to drink and drive.
>
>     Today's copy of the Lectronic Latitude from California
>     (published by the magazine Latitude 38 on the web)
>     editorialized on the case. They don't apparently think much of it.
>
>     I though you might find it interesting despite the extreme
>     language used by the web published journal:
>
>     *Government and Courts in California*
>
>     *June 12, 2008 – Lake County, California*
>
>     *"Just because a deputy sheriff negligently slams into a
>     stationary boat at 45 mph killing *
>     *a woman doesn't mean he should be charged with any crime," the
>     California Attorney *
>     *General and his office seem to be arguing by their silence.*
>
>     *© 2008 Latitude 38 Publishing Co., Inc.*
>
>     *In just the next chapter in the book on complete crap justice in
>     California, on Wednesday *
>     *Judge Richard Martin ruled there was enough evidence for
>     39-year-old Bismarck Dinius *
>     *of Sacramento to stand trial on charges of vehicular manslaughter
>     in the April 29, 2006, *
>     *boating accident on Clear Lake that resulted in the death of Lynn
>     Thornton.*
>
>     *In a world where there was even a smidgen of justice, Judge
>     Martin would have stopped *
>     *the four-day hearing during the first 10 minutes to excoriate the
>     Lake County District *
>     *Attorney for charging the wrong man with the crime.*
>
>     *For as the outrage now stands, Deputy Sheriff Russell Perdock,
>     who on that dark night *
>     *slammed his high-powered speedboat into the quarter of the
>     sailboat that Thornton *
>     *was on at an admitted 40 to 45 mph — and perhaps as fast as 60
>     mph — hasn't been *
>     *charged with anything!*
>
>     *Even a moron in robes would have recognized that Thornton would
>     not have been *
>     *killed, let alone injured, had Perdock not been violating the
>     most basic rules of *
>     *the road. Even a moron in robes would have recognized that
>     Thornton would not *
>     *have been killed, let alone injured, had Perdock followed even
>     the most basic *
>     *notion of common sense.*
>
>     *We ask all of you to put yourselves, as ordinary citizens, in
>     Perdock's blood-soaked *
>     *boat shoes. If you'd been operating your boat at 40 to 45 mph on
>     a pitch black lake *
>     *at night, knowing full well that there were often boats and rafts
>     on the lake after dark, *
>     *and slammed into a stationary boat, killing a woman, do you think
>     the District Attorney *
>     *would have patted you on the back and said, "Don't worry about
>     it, you didn't do anything *
>     *wrong"? Or do you think he would have kicked your ass in jail and
>     thrown away the key? *
>     *And if that was the case for you, do you think it was or should
>     be any different if the *
>     *negligent boat operator was a colleague of the D.A.'s in law
>     enforcement?*
>
>     *The prosecution's case rests on two main contentions. First, that
>     the running lights *
>     *of the sailboat in question, Beats Workin' II, were not on.
>     Although the District Attorney *
>     *apparently didn't want to hear it, at least two witnesses,
>     including a former law enforcement *
>     *officer, have testified that the sailboat's running lights were
>     on prior to the collision. Second, *
>     *that Bismarck, who happened to be at the helm as opposed to the
>     owner of the boat, who was *
>     *a few feet away, had a blood level of .12, which is over the
>     legal limit. It's true that Bismarck *
>     *should not have been over the limit — a few years back, mind you,
>     he would have been under *
>     *it — but what's much more important is that even a stone cold
>     sober Russell Coutts couldn't *
>     *have driven the near motionless sailboat out of the path of
>     Perdock's powerboat roaring at *
>     *them out of the blackness.*
>
>     *Bismarck Dinius is slated to stand trial this fall . . . unless,
>     against all odds, someone in this *
>     *entirely corrupt process decides that their vow to stand for
>     truth and justice really means *
>     *something. That somebody should be former California Governor
>     Jerry Brown, who is *
>     *currently the Attorney General of the State of California. So
>     what's it going to be Jerry *
>     *— are you going to just sit there and collect yet another state
>     paycheck, or do you still *
>     *really give a shit about justice? And please give your answer in
>     a loud and clear voice, *
>     *because we all want to hear your response.*
>
>     *(If you'd like to donate to Dinius' defense fund, send checks
>     made out to Bismarck Dinius, *
>     *writing “Bismarck Dinius Defense Fund” in the memo section, to
>     Sierra Central Credit *
>     *Union, Attn: Brian Foxworthy, Branch Manager, 306 N. Sunrise
>     Ave., Roseville, CA 95661. *
>     *You can also email your opinion on this case to the Public
>     Investigations Unit of Mr. *
>     *Brown's office.)*
>
>
>     Ed Kelly (& Sue Kelly)
>     USSV Angel Louise - a Catalac catamaran
>     Our Skype Phone (202) 657-6357
>     Email: EdKelly ("at" symbol) netins.net
>
>
>
>     =
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     Liveaboard mailing list
>     [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>     To adjust your membership settings over the web 
> http://www.liveaboardnow.org/mailman/listinfo/liveaboard
>     To subscribe send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>     To unsubscribe send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>     The archives are at http://www.liveaboardnow.org/pipermail/liveaboard/
>
>     To search the archives 
> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
>
>     The Mailman Users Guide can be found here 
> http://www.gnu.org/software/mailman/mailman-member/index.html
>
>     ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>     Get the Moviefone Toolbar
> 
> <http://toolbar.aol.com/moviefone/download.html?ncid=aolcmp00050000000011>.
>     Showtimes, theaters, movie news, & more!
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Liveaboard mailing list
> [email protected]
> To adjust your membership settings over the web 
> http://www.liveaboardnow.org/mailman/listinfo/liveaboard
> To subscribe send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> To unsubscribe send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> The archives are at http://www.liveaboardnow.org/pipermail/liveaboard/
>
> To search the archives 
> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
>
> The Mailman Users Guide can be found here 
> http://www.gnu.org/software/mailman/mailman-member/index.html

_______________________________________________
Liveaboard mailing list
[email protected]
To adjust your membership settings over the web 
http://www.liveaboardnow.org/mailman/listinfo/liveaboard
To subscribe send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To unsubscribe send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The archives are at http://www.liveaboardnow.org/pipermail/liveaboard/

To search the archives 
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]

The Mailman Users Guide can be found here 
http://www.gnu.org/software/mailman/mailman-member/index.html


_______________________________________________
Liveaboard mailing list
[email protected]
To adjust your membership settings over the web 
http://www.liveaboardnow.org/mailman/listinfo/liveaboard
To subscribe send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To unsubscribe send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The archives are at http://www.liveaboardnow.org/pipermail/liveaboard/

To search the archives http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]

The Mailman Users Guide can be found here 
http://www.gnu.org/software/mailman/mailman-member/index.html

Reply via email to