On Mon, 2005-09-19 at 14:33 -0400, Jeremy Huntwork wrote: > Thomas Pegg wrote: > > For the livecd it would be like 1-10 are reserved for common patches to > > all arches, then from there groups of 10 for arch specific patches for > > each arch. I think this would lower the potential of having overriding > > patch numbers, I already ran into this with the recent gcc4 upgrade, I > > had to renumber some of the patches. It's not a big deal but would be > > good thing for the future I think. > > That sounds alright. Since it's your idea, I'll let you figure out the > specifics, if you don't mind. :)
Not at all. I figure a setup like this would do fine: 1-10 - Common patches 11-20 - x86 only 21-30 - ppc only 31-40 - sparc only 41-50 - x86_64 only Of course the ranges could be expanded further, but I don't see any package requiring more than 10 patches. -- Thomas LFS User : 4729 / Linux User : 298329 kitt - Powered by: Linux 2.6.12.3 08:45:49 up 30 min, 1 user, load average: 0.01, 0.08, 0.08
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/livecd FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
