Alexander E. Patrakov wrote:
The question is: should we maintain the dm branch any further, with the risk of acquiring other unneeded differences? An alternative is to declare this branch as dead, and apply that patch (containing no junk differences) if/when the need to replace unionfs with dm really shows up.
Yes, let's leave it as dead. As I mentioned, I like having this concept as a failsafe.
One more wish: please aviod such "forgotten" feature branches in the future. IMHO, once the feature is ready for merging, the branch should become dead. "svn diff" between the branch creation time and its death usually contains a good patch against the trunk then.
Agreed. So no changes to the dm branch. This, as you said, will apply to future concept branches when they become stable and ready to merge. For that to work, we'll need to know on-list when that happens. :)
-- JH -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/livecd FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
