Point taken and I understand :)
On 4/12/07, Alexander E. Patrakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Chris Barnes wrote: > > Hi guys and girls, > > I'm new to this list. I've been playing around with LFS a bit and I > > have a suggestion. > > > > Has anyone thought about building an LFS virtual machine as an > > alternative to the livecd? > > History has shown that providing any pre-built LFS implementation that can > easily save its state means increased load upon LFS support channels (IRC > and mailing lists) because of people who try to cheat. They say "I already > have my LFS and now I met this stupid BLFS problem, please help", without > actually going through LFS. Therefore, the virtual machine suggestion will > never be implemented officially. You are free to do it on your own, but > please note that publishing your findings would be a very irresponsible > conduct. > > -- > Alexander E. Patrakov > -- > http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/livecd > FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ > Unsubscribe: See the above information page > -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/livecd FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
