lists wrote: > nope to xp, it can barely load win98. nowhere near enough ram for xp.
Could you please read Microsoft specifications before posting such a lie? Windows XP has a minimum required amount of RAM equal to 64 MB (you can check this by installing it in qemu or another emulator). So this must be something else. IOW, the non-installability of XP confirms the "damaged hardware" suspicion. -- Alexander E. Patrakov -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/livecd FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
