On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 1:35 AM, James Heather <[email protected]> wrote:
> The two counter-arguments seem to be: > > (1) that syslinux was rejected, which is small; > > (2) that it might introduce unnecessary bugs. > > I haven't followed the thread of (1), but it's a separate issue as to > whether syslinux is worth the extra space, even if it's small. In any case, > custom builds are always free to include or not include syslinux. If you > don't like what's on the base DVD, build your own--that's the whole point of > this list. Yes, thank you for showing how exactly not concerned you are about the requirement on network and not being able to use the DVD ISO for Fedora livecd-tools testing is to you. I am glad you and Bruno both see the syslinux issue to be an issue which I can rectify myself if I woanted. I know I can, the fact it it would benefit many other people. You guys need to get over yourselves. > I don't accept (2). Obviously any change needs thorough testing, but there > are procedures for that, that's what rawhide is for, and we even have a list > (this one) where people can get additional help. Like anything else, it > won't see the light of day (stable repos) if it doesn't work properly. livecd-tools doesn't work properly already, and it is in stable repositories. Try again. -- livecd mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/livecd
