Peter Fraser had been dabbling<http://www.mail-archive.com/search?q=batik&l=general%40livelykernel.sunlabs.com> with Lively running in Batik <http://xmlgraphics.apache.org/batik/>.
When Lively was at Sun one of the first implementations I think was not browser-based. But that was probably in 2007 and Dan, Robert, or Jens can probably better answer this. Otherwise, here are some links: http://xmlgraphics.apache.org/batik/ http://www.appcelerator.com/ http://www.fluidapp.com/ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Site-specific_browser On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 3:26 PM, Lawson English <[email protected]> wrote: > How difficult would it be to divorce LK from the webbrowser? If some > hypothetical LK plugin were given a handle to a buffer of some kind, how > much work would it take to make LK a plugin without dragging all of html > with it? > > To plug into what? I think it would be nice maybe if an application existed which implemented solely JavaScript and the W3C canvas api to run Lively. > > The reason why I ask is that LK would make a great game engine GUI in > many contexts. > Yes, I think it would. > > > Lawson > _______________________________________________ > lively-kernel mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.hpi.uni-potsdam.de/listinfo/lively-kernel >
_______________________________________________ lively-kernel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.hpi.uni-potsdam.de/listinfo/lively-kernel
