Hi.

Our trac instance and Lively's issues folder have been fairly active; and 
Lively Kernel as well: we fixed a couple of critical issues in the last week!

Our ideas on using trac and Lively can be found here: 
http://www.lively-kernel.org/repository/webwerkstatt/projects/LivelyKernel/process.xhtml
Any feedback? :-)

Best,
Lauritz

On Nov 4, 2011, at 10:40 AM, Lauritz Thamsen wrote:

> Hi.
> 
> In the last week we started to use Lively's trac again. There, we keep track 
> of existing issues, feature requests and necessary refactorings. 
> 
> Besides trac we also use Lively itself for issue reports. Whenever there's a 
> bug that's description isn't absolutely trivial, it's a great help to have a 
> small example in Lively for the issue. Such issue pages are usual Lively 
> worlds and, therefore, can contain any morphs and texts that help to 
> understand and reproduce issues. Examples: 
> http://lively-kernel.org/repository/webwerkstatt/issues/111017_StaticBindingOfSuperInClosures.xhtml,
>  
> http://lively-kernel.org/repository/webwerkstatt/issues/111026_CustomFormattedBinsInPartsBin.xhtml
> 
> We create such issue worlds from a template: 
> http://lively-kernel.org/repository/webwerkstatt/issues/CreateIssuePage.xhtml.
> 
> Please feel free to contribute!
> 
> Best,
> Lauritz

_______________________________________________
lively-kernel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.hpi.uni-potsdam.de/listinfo/lively-kernel

Reply via email to