On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 4:21 AM, Lawson English <[email protected]> wrote: > Actually, I was thinking in more simplistic terms of simply a one-click > localhost install of the current version of LK. Versioning and so on wasn't > what I was concerned with. Having to set up apache, etc., in order to simply > play with LK seems to be a rather larger hurdle to expect people to overcome > just to play with a private sandbox.
I completely agree. At this point, we would need a WebDAV HTTP server in Squeak in order to make Lively run from a one-click Squeak image. If you know such a server, please let us know. Technically, WebDAV is only a design decision. We might want to decouple our tools from DAV and think of a simpler protocol for Lively installations that do not need DAV SVN versioning. WebDAV is pretty awesome the moment it works, but getting there can be painful. Best, Fabian _______________________________________________ lively-kernel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.hpi.uni-potsdam.de/listinfo/lively-kernel
