If anyone wants more info on this, this stackoverflow post might be helpful:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1242830/constructor-initialization-list-evaluation-order On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 9:30 AM, Greg Clayton <[email protected]> wrote: > Many compilers warn when ivars are initialized out of the order in which > they were defined in the class definition. The change was probably getting > rid of that warning. > > > On Aug 30, 2013, at 2:49 AM, Abid, Hafiz <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi Eric, > > I have a comment about the change in GDBRemoteCommunicationClient.cpp. I > have no objection to the change but I was wondering why was it needed. > > > > Regards, > > Abid > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: [email protected] [mailto:lldb-commits- > >> [email protected]] On Behalf Of Eric Christopher > >> Sent: 30 August 2013 03:12 > >> To: [email protected] > >> Subject: [Lldb-commits] [PATCH] Fix warnings and one set of build > issues on > >> linux > >> > >> Here's a patch to fix a pile of warnings using ToT clang to build lldb. > Mostly > >> the deprecation of "register", but a couple of others around floating > point > >> constants etc. > >> > >> The one build fix is in IOChannel and seems that for, at least my ubuntu > >> machine, we need to use the same readline that FreeBSD does. > >> > >> Thoughts/Objections? OK? > >> > >> -eric > > > > _______________________________________________ > > lldb-commits mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits > > _______________________________________________ > lldb-commits mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits >
_______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
