I see, sorry about that. I will fix it by adding the atomic stuff in lldb/Host then.
On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 8:56 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: > Yes, I agree with this part. It should not be necessary to have the LLVM > headers around to build programs that only use the lldb SB API's. > > Jim > > On Sep 4, 2013, at 4:36 PM, Malea, Daniel <[email protected]> wrote: > > > This commit introduces a dependency in the LLDB API on the LLVM headers, > > which is not ideal because users of the LLDB API shouldn't be required to > > have LLVM headers around IMHO. > > > >
_______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
