Ed Maste wrote:
It's not quite that straightforward though, because the LLVM version
has cases for version >= 4, which has an additional field in the
prologue header format.
Yes, that's true. At some stage the code should be properly shared
between llvm and lldb, and a fully-featured (i.e. supporting DWARF 4 and
beyond) prologue handler deployed.
I'll change the test to < 2 || > 3 for now.
That's fine with me.
Matt
Member of the CSR plc group of companies. CSR plc registered in England and
Wales, registered number 4187346, registered office Churchill House, Cambridge
Business Park, Cowley Road, Cambridge, CB4 0WZ, United Kingdom
More information can be found at www.csr.com. Keep up to date with CSR on our
technical blog, www.csr.com/blog, CSR people blog, www.csr.com/people, YouTube,
www.youtube.com/user/CSRplc, Facebook,
www.facebook.com/pages/CSR/191038434253534, or follow us on Twitter at
www.twitter.com/CSR_plc.
New for 2014, you can now access the wide range of products powered by aptX at
www.aptx.com.
_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
