Thanks for clarifying this, Jim. For the embedded sys I'm looking at that's probably not a concern, but thanks for clearing it up.
Matt

[email protected] wrote:
No, in that case something in the system is expected to make the process 
appear.  This feature is for catching daemon processes that get launched by the 
system on behalf of other processes.  The debugger is just expected to poll 
waiting for the process to show up.

Jim

On May 11, 2014, at 10:34 PM, Matthew Gardiner <[email protected]> wrote:

Thanks for providing the documentation, Jim.

So in the case of vAttachOrWait, if the process is not already there, what 
entity is responsible for the launching of it? Would that be the stub itself, 
or is this where lldb-platform steps in?

thanks
Matt






Member of the CSR plc group of companies. CSR plc registered in England and 
Wales, registered number 4187346, registered office Churchill House, Cambridge 
Business Park, Cowley Road, Cambridge, CB4 0WZ, United Kingdom
More information can be found at www.csr.com. Keep up to date with CSR on our 
technical blog, www.csr.com/blog, CSR people blog, www.csr.com/people, YouTube, 
www.youtube.com/user/CSRplc, Facebook, 
www.facebook.com/pages/CSR/191038434253534, or follow us on Twitter at 
www.twitter.com/CSR_plc.
New for 2014, you can now access the wide range of products powered by aptX at 
www.aptx.com.
_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits

Reply via email to