Well, we can keep it simple until proven needed to be more complex :-) I'll switch it to a constant and re-send.
On Saturday, July 12, 2014, Ed Maste <[email protected]> wrote: > On 11 July 2014 11:56, Todd Fiala <[email protected] <javascript:;>> > wrote: > > My take was it depends on host details. For example, I didn't track down > > the Windows way of getting this data, but I wouldn't be surprised if it > > turned into a method call to the system (which could be cached, but > that's > > an impl detail that a method call would allow us to hide). > > > > I thought it made it more flexible on unknown details for current/future > > platforms to have it be a function call. > > Fair enough, and it's not a big deal - I just assume it will in > general be a (possibly empirically determined) constant. > > I did a little digging and couldn't find a limit for Windows. I did > discover the convoluted method used to set the thread name though: > http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/xcb2z8hs.aspx > _______________________________________________ > lldb-commits mailing list > [email protected] <javascript:;> > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits > -- Todd Fiala | Software Engineer | [email protected] | 650-943-3180
_______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
