That looks okay.  Thanks for looking at this.  Seems to me that if you're only 
synchronization is locking access to some flag, then you're either doing 
something fairly weak (like the log example) or missing some real 
synchronization...  So it's worth viewing the necessity of the change with 
skepticism.

Jim

> On Sep 12, 2014, at 11:15 AM, Shawn Best <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Hi Jim, thanks for the feedback.
> 
> I agree these may fall into the category of 'formally correct, but not 
> strictly necessary.'  One good thing is it makes clear the intention these 
> variables are being directly accessed from multiple threads.
> 
> Something I noticed about thread sanitizer is that it will complain if 2 
> threads access the same memory without a synchronization mechanism between 
> them, even if those accesses are separated by a good amount of time (or some 
> other kind of logic). 
> 
> Looking at closer at exit status, the problem,  I think I should add a mutex 
> to Process::SetExitStatus() , GetExitStatus(), GetExitDescription().  This 
> should prevent an exit code and exit string potentially not matching.
> 
> Yes, ProcessPosix, ProcessFreeBSD directly setting the variable, then calling 
> a function to do so, looks a little weird, I've cleaned that up.
> 
> As far as I can tell, if someone were to turn logging on/off in the middle of 
> a function dumping log information... the worst that would happen is it would 
> not start/stop a bit late.  The typical usage pattern will check the flag 
> once at the beginning of the function and keep the pointer for the duration 
> of the function.  I don't think that would be anything a user would notice.
> 
> Shawn.
> 
> http://reviews.llvm.org/D5302
> 
> Files:
>  include/lldb/Core/Communication.h
>  include/lldb/Core/ConnectionFileDescriptor.h
>  include/lldb/Target/Process.h
>  source/Plugins/Process/FreeBSD/ProcessFreeBSD.cpp
>  source/Plugins/Process/POSIX/ProcessPOSIX.cpp
>  source/Plugins/Process/gdb-remote/ProcessGDBRemote.h
>  source/Target/Process.cpp
>  source/lldb-log.cpp
> <D5302.13649.patch>_______________________________________________
> lldb-commits mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits

_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits

Reply via email to