Unpleasantly enough, even skipping the test is not currently a thing for inline tests as far as I can tell The way to disable it would be to revert it - or comment out everything in the .py file I think it’s interesting enough to have facilities to apply attributes (@skip, @expectedFail, …) to lldbinline-based tests - let me see if Sean and I can come up with something today
> On Oct 27, 2014, at 9:31 AM, Zachary Turner <[email protected]> wrote: > > Would it be worth disabling the test until we get it figured out? > > On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 8:11 AM, Ed Maste <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > On 24 October 2014 17:27, Enrico Granata <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > Sean, > > is there any provision in lldbinline for saying “Darwin-only”? or any other > > attribute for that matter... > > Ping? I would really like to get this sorted out ASAP so that we can > keep on top of any new regressions. > > _______________________________________________ > lldb-commits mailing list > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits > <http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits> > Thanks, - Enrico 📩 egranata@.com ☎️ 27683
_______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
