Actually, on the bike ride home I realized that one of your concerns is justified: There is no formatter for the comment field in the disassembly output. A lot of different things can appear here -- this could be an address to an instruction in the current function, in a different function, in a segment of memory with no symbol at all, and there are a bunch of special behaviors like if it's the address of const data string, lldb prints the string. And I mentioned earlier, lldb has assembler hints it can output and we've got a low-priority ToDo to expose those hints to the user -- in the comment field too.
This is a drag - my patch, as it is written today, is going to write branch instructions inside the current function as <+36> regardless of any format setting. :/ REPOSITORY rL LLVM http://reviews.llvm.org/D7578 EMAIL PREFERENCES http://reviews.llvm.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/ _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
