On 4 March 2015 at 20:36, Zachary Turner <[email protected]> wrote: > > This seems like kind of a straightforward case of code reuse to > me, and a clear win, so I'm not sure why it's that contentious. > > If we need to interoperate with StreamString, then we should implement an > overload **in LLVM** that returns an std::string.
I agree completely. For OS X, having our own LLDB-specific implementation may not make too much difference. But the downsides on other platforms outweigh whatever benefit we might get from having it. _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
