That seems like something you should fix on the MI side. The point of synchronous execution is that you don't have to worry about the events. Now you are introducing an extra event that everybody is going to have to deal with. That doesn't seem right to me.
Jim > On May 8, 2015, at 8:46 AM, Ilia K <[email protected]> wrote: > > @jingham wrote: > >> I don't understand this. The Command line worked just fine and informed the >> user about stops without this extra event being generated. Why does the MI >> need what the command line doesn't? > > > The CL notifies user by printing the (lldb) prompt when something happened > (exception or BP hit etc.) and execution was stopped. If user don't want to > wait he can press ^C and execution will be interrupted and the (lldb) prompt > will be printed. > > Usually IDE uses MI in async mode and therefore it can't determine whether > execution was stopped or not. In that case MI should notify IDE using the > *stopped notification and IDE always expects to see it when execution was > stopped. This patch fixes the *stopped notification in sync mode (which is > used for handling of --source option) because IDE expects to see *stopped in > any case in despite of current mode of debugger > > > http://reviews.llvm.org/D9371 > > EMAIL PREFERENCES > http://reviews.llvm.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/ > > _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
