labath added a comment.

In http://reviews.llvm.org/D10887#198526, @chaoren wrote:

> Using a shim results in about a 5M increase in the lldb-server binary
>  because of the need to export all symbols dynamically. And still has those
>  two bugs (which would be in the system libs, if linked dynamically).


Couldn't this be avoided somehow (with some __attribute__ magic or something). 
In reality, we just need one symbol, "lldb_main", or such).

And if that proves unfeasible and we have to statically link, I would prefer 
patching bugs in older libc over patching "features" in newer ones.


http://reviews.llvm.org/D10887




_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@cs.uiuc.edu
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits

Reply via email to