clayborg added a comment.
See inlined comments.
================
Comment at: test/expression_command/options/TestExprOptions.py:46-55
@@ +45,12 @@
+
+ # FIXME: runCmd (called by expect) fails if an error is
+ # returned making it impossible to add negative tests. As a
+ # workaround, we'll expect runCmd to fail using the following
+ # method:
+ try:
+ self.expect("expression blabla",
+ startstr = "unexpected value")
+ self.assertTrue(false, "runCmd didn't fail")
+ except:
+ print "OK"
+
----------------
use self.runCmd(check=False,...) instead of self.expect(...). You should
actually use the "lldb.SB*" API if possible unless you are explicitly trying to
test textual output from commands. Please don't use self.expect() or
self.runCmd() if you can use "lldb.SB*" API calls.
Repository:
rL LLVM
http://reviews.llvm.org/D11447
_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@cs.uiuc.edu
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
