dawn requested a review of this revision. dawn added a comment. I need guidance due to conflicting directions from Greg and Sean. Sean wants to be able to evaluate ObjC++ by default always, hence this feature was made optional. Greg feels the frame can be used for the language without an option, but that will break the ability to evaluate ObjC++ anytime.
See also: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11102 - eval in language of frame's CU and add C++ language option to ObjC so tests will still work. http://reviews.llvm.org/D11173 - rewrote test which tested ObjC types in C++ test case to be ObjC++ so test would still work. We can either go with this patch, or http://reviews.llvm.org/D11102 and http://reviews.llvm.org/D11173. I would choose this patch because it makes the behavior optional, and everyone is happy. Please advise. Thank you. Repository: rL LLVM http://reviews.llvm.org/D11482 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@cs.uiuc.edu http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
