dawn planned changes to this revision. dawn added a comment. I'll update this patch to what I believe Greg wants in http://reviews.llvm.org/D11482, and merge in http://reviews.llvm.org/D11173 which is also needed in that case.
================ Comment at: source/Commands/CommandObjectExpression.cpp:311 @@ +310,3 @@ + } + } + ---------------- dawn wrote: > Ignore this part of the patch - the language will instead be controlled by an > option as discussed in http://reviews.llvm.org/D11119. It is useful for > testing purposes however, to show where test cases are using expressions > outside the scope of the CU's language. In http://reviews.llvm.org/D11482, Greg says he doesn't want this to be controlled be an option, so this part of the patch stays. Repository: rL LLVM http://reviews.llvm.org/D11102 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@cs.uiuc.edu http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
