tfiala added a comment. Also, I should mention this was tested on OS X in addition to Linux.
Let me know when you get a chance to run it on Windows, Zachary. > Are there any plans to actually just kill dosep.py at some point? Hmm not seeing my response to this from my phone last night, so at the cost of potentially repeating: Absolutely. I think there is a fair amount of cleanup that could happen to the test running code. I'd expect later to see the dosep.py functionality turn into an LLDBTestRunner class or something similar, with a concrete impl for the single-serialized running and a separate one for multithreaded running. There are many areas that could be cleaned up (both in terms of code organization and things like pep8/pylint --- a few of which I took care of in this change but the majority of which I left unchanged). My goal for this particular change was to be minimally different at the implementation level to simplify the transition --- get the user interface right (no dosep.py from the user's point of view). In using a minimal implementation change, I'm also hopeful to avoid things like breaking the Windows build. http://reviews.llvm.org/D12587 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
