Looks great, thanks for fixing this.

On 9 November 2015 at 22:08, Tim Northover <t.p.northo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 3 November 2015 at 07:38, Pavel Labath <lab...@google.com> wrote:
>> Looks good, but I'd like to avoid adding new "not remote ready" tests
>> to the test suite. Your test looks like it should be easy to fix --
>> the only problem there is the stdout redirection. If you *don't*
>> redirect the output, you should be able to access the stdout via
>> self.process.GetSTDOUT() and verify that.
>
> Thanks Pavel, that made the test quite a bit simpler. I've committed
> it in r252521.
>
> Tim.
_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits

Reply via email to