krytarowski added a comment.

In http://reviews.llvm.org/D19685#417896, @zturner wrote:

> I don't think we should be adding more CMake hacks in lldb when llvm is
>  supposed to handle this. Why don't the existing lines work?


I don't know. Perhaps because LLVM and Clang requires newer cmake than 2.8.11.

I tested locally with setting the minimal required version to 2.8.12.2 and LLDB 
builds.


Repository:
  rL LLVM

http://reviews.llvm.org/D19685



_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits

Reply via email to