labath added a comment.

Thank you for writing the tests. I have two stylistic comments, but otherwise 
looks great.


================
Comment at: source/Plugins/Process/gdb-remote/GDBRemoteClientBase.cpp:113
@@ -105,4 +112,3 @@
             case 'J':
-                // Asynchronous JSON packet, destined for a
-                // StructuredDataPlugin.
             {
+                // Verify this J packet is a JSON-async: packet.
----------------
I'd like to move this code to a separate function. The main job of 
`SendContinuePacketAndWaitForResponse` is dealing with the thread 
synchronization issues, which is tricky enough without having json parsing in 
the middle of it.

================
Comment at: unittests/Process/gdb-remote/GDBRemoteClientBaseTest.cpp:371
@@ +370,3 @@
+    ASSERT_EQ("T01", response.GetStringRef());
+    ASSERT_EQ(fix.delegate.structured_data_entries.size(), 1);
+    
----------------
Please put the "expected" values first (`ASSERT_NE(expected, actual)`). 
Otherwise the error message will come out wrong when the comparison fails. The 
same issue is present in a number of other checks.


https://reviews.llvm.org/D23884



_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits

Reply via email to