I agree completely with tackling the easy stuff first. That said, the easy stuff (probably >50% of the testsuite) doesn't even require command-line interaction and is just of the form "stop here, run this one expression, maybe print this variable using 'frame variab'e'" I would argue that we can find a simpler way to handle these cases than feeding lldb command lines to the command-line parser. To be clear, that simpler way is not the SB API, it's probably a special-purpose language that knows how to stop at breakpoints and inspect locals/run expressions. That's all it does. The SB API / command line parser argument is for what I'd argue are the complex cases, and I think we should deal with those later because they're both technically hairy and seem to attract more discussion.
Sean > On Sep 14, 2016, at 5:57 PM, Zachary Turner <ztur...@google.com> wrote: > > 1. get all the easy stuff out of the way first, such as the tests in this > patch (and there are probably at least 100 more that are just as easy) >
_______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits