https://github.com/labath commented:
I think this is one of those tests that should really be an API test. As far as I can tell, there's nothing darwin-specific about this bug -- except for the fact that building shared libraries in a cross-platform manner is hard. But the API tests have wrappers that let us do that, and they even support windows. (I had a feeling our docs already stated that shared libraries is a reason to make something an API test, but I can't find that now.) I understand the desire to not skip a test (and that making it an API test will make that even harder, as a crash will bring down the entire test), but I'm not sure if that's so useful as to override this. I also think that making a test which checks that something fails in a particular way can be fragile (as a random refactor could make it fail in a different way). That said, thank you for reducing this. Having this around somewhere will be very useful for fixing this (eventually). From the looks of things, it may be possible to get rid of the dlopen/dlsym thing as well (replace it with hard shared library dependencies) -- it seems the important part is that the two modules have different definitions of one type, and the way that the shared library is loaded is beside the point. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112566 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
