> On Oct 19, 2016, at 6:35 AM, Pavel Labath via lldb-commits 
> <lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> 
> 
> ================
> Comment at: source/Plugins/Language/CPlusPlus/LibStdcppUniquePointer.cpp:110
> +  if (name == ConstString("ptr") || name == ConstString("pointer")) return 2;
> +  return UINT32_MAX;
> +}
> ----------------
> ~0 ?
> 

Everywhere else in lldb where we use the maximum of the size returned to mean 
some error condition, we use UINT32_MAX.  I actually think that's clearer, and 
looks similar to places where we have other illegal value defines, whereas this 
just looks like some odd computation.  I don't think this is a good change, and 
certainly not done in just one place.

Jim
_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits

Reply via email to