jasonmolenda wrote: Maybe I'm missing something, but I disagree with this change. We're talking about when you're stopped in a stack frame that has debug info (a file and line number), but the source file is unavailable, right. There is a setting to control this behavior already -- `stop-disassembly-display`. It defaults to `no-debuginfo`, but it can be `never`, `always`, `no-source`, or `no-debuginfo`.
People who are debugging at a source level, generally, do not want to see assembly, and in fact will be confused if they are shown assembly. We do not want to show assembly for a stack frame where we have a debug filename and line number, by default. The user may not have set up the target.source-map to map lldb to the source file, and could be looking at it in another source window as they're stepping, or they may know roughly how many lines a method has as they step through it. The assembly only adds distraction to them. Am I misunderstanding what we're talking about here? https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/136494 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
