zturner added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D26971#602738, @clayborg wrote:
> It would be nice if we can find a way to be able to use any time units we > want when specifying the timeout. I would rather not have everyone have to > convert their times to microseconds. Maybe we just add some overloads to the > public facing functions and have just one internal function that uses > llvm::Optional. > > As a side note I would also like us to fix llvm::Optional so it can be > debugged. Right now if you expand an llvm::Optional<T> you see the an array > of characters instead of your type T which means when debugging you can't see > your type's value. Boost correctly uses C++11 unions so that we can see the > type when expanded in the debugger. Couldn't someone just add a data formatter for llvm::Optional<> to lldb? https://reviews.llvm.org/D26971 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
