Jlalond wrote: @labath
I refactored to the best of my ability the signal parsing. Thankfully even getting `thread siginfo` working. However I'm unhappy with how I'm handling the ValueObject in the Linux Signals, I couldn't find an easy way to make this into some generic siginfo linux type, so I'm directly accessing members. While it's good I made a better way of doing this, I feel this is worse in terms of safety due to having to explore the ValueObject hierarchy. Any advice here? Secondly, while testing I found the layout in the valueobject differs to the `siginfo_t` on my machine in some subtle ways. Even if the Core was generated on my machine. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/140150 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
