da-viper wrote: > I assume that was done to avoid generating a unique reference for address as > we're instruction stepping through assembly code? Does this patch address > that, or is this not a concern.
Yes this is the case, it may get truncated since the memory address is larger than the size of the sourceReference specified in the spec. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/144364 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
