================
@@ -253,30 +436,35 @@ _LIBCPP_CONSTEXPR_SINCE_CXX20 void __split_buffer<_Tp, 
_Allocator>::__construct_
 template <class _Tp, class _Allocator>
 _LIBCPP_CONSTEXPR_SINCE_CXX20 void
 __split_buffer<_Tp, _Allocator>::__construct_at_end(size_type __n, 
const_reference __x) {
-  _ConstructTransaction __tx(std::addressof(this->__end_), __n);
+  _ConstructTransaction __tx(this, __data_.end(), __n);
   for (; __tx.__pos_ != __tx.__end_; ++__tx.__pos_) {
-    __alloc_traits::construct(__alloc_, std::__to_address(__tx.__pos_), __x);
+    __alloc_traits::construct(__data_.__alloc_, 
std::__to_address(__tx.__pos_), __x);
   }
 }
 
-template <class _Tp, class _Allocator>
-template <class _Iterator, class _Sentinel>
+template<class _Tp, class _Allocator>
+template<class _Iterator, class _Sentinel>
----------------
ldionne wrote:

Nitpick: this seems to be an unintentional formatting change. Does clang-format 
not complain?

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/139632
_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits

Reply via email to