krytarowski added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D29256#660072, @ki.stfu wrote:
> I don't know the point of this patch (probably it's something special for > NetBSD? @emaste) but I'm okay with that. It's undefined (implementation defined) behavior. C++11 5.2.2/7: > Passing a potentially-evaluated argument of class type having a non-trivial > copy constructor, a non-trivial move contructor, or a non-trivial destructor, > with no corresponding parameter, is conditionally-supported with > implementation-defined semantics. > This patch was created to address compiler warning. Repository: rL LLVM https://reviews.llvm.org/D29256 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
